Senate effort to return candidates to ballots fails

 

Published on 5/9/2012

This week’s efforts  by the S.C. Senate to place disqualified candidates back on the June primary ballot has failed.
The Republicans in the Senate attempted to attach an amendment onto the third reading of an election bill. That amendment would have given the more than 180 candidates from across the state who were deemed ineligible by the S.C. Supreme Court a chance to get back on the ballot.
It would have placed any candidate who filed their ethics disclosure forms by April 15 to be in the primaries.
Senate Republicans failed Wednesday to attach to an election bill on "third reading" an amendment re-instating candidates who filed required forms by April 15. The attempt to fast-track the proposal required overriding a Senate rule barring unrelated amendments to a bill.
Among the candidates who were determined to have filed their forms late are Rod Stalvey, who was running for Georgetown County Auditor and Tammie Avant, who was a clerk of court candidate.

Leave a Response

Notice about comments:
Gtowntimes.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Gtowntimes.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not gtowntimes.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Post a Comment





Latest Polls

The National Transportation Safety Board is recommending lowering the legal blood alcohol content limit for drivers from .08 percent to .05 percent. They say it will decrease the number of traffic fatalities. Do you agree with this idea?
  • Yes
  • No


Advertisement