Letter, February 8, 2013

 

Published on 2/7/2013

Are cats really the reason birds are vanishing?

The Audubon Society released a report a few years ago on the sharp and startling decline of some of the most familiar and common birds in America; the Northern bobwhite, several kinds of sparrows, the common grackle and the Eastern meadowlark. The average decline of the 20 species in the report is 68 percent.

In the last 50 years, we humans have killed millions of birds, or unintentionally caused a dramatic population loss, simply by going about business as usual and somehow trusted that that all the innocent little birds were here to stay. Agriculture has intensified. So has development. Open space has been sharply reduced.

The report of common bird species in decline is really a report on the human impact on birds. We only notice the fate of a species of bird when the death watch is on. The word “extinct” somehow brings to mind the birds that seem like special cases to us.

The passenger pigeons once were around in enormous numbers and were thought to be indestructible. It’s the enormous numbers of humans to whom their comings and goings were a common sight and who thought that the unending clouds of birds were indestructible. We recognize the extraordinary distinctness of the passenger pigeon only now because we know its fate, killed off largely by humans. What they actually needed to survive, it turns out, was a landscape that was less intensely human.

A report by Jason Rylander, senior staff attorney at Defenders of Wildlife, estimated that each year, five million birds meet their death as they collide with radio towers and other communication structures. At least 230 species are affected including cerulean warblers, black rails and other species in decline.

I do not believe that most people would actively kill a whippoorwill if they had the chance. Yet in the last 50 years its number too has dropped by 1.6 million.

Who we are depends as much upon the richness and diversity of the biological life around us and how we correlate our economic behavior with the welfare of other species. But the very foundation of our economic interest is self-interest; what we fail to recognize is that the survival of other species requires a particular habitat, strictness in their diets, and a precision of the niches they occupy in order to survive. We look around and expect the rest of world’s occupants to adapt to the changes we have caused, only to realize too late the damage we have done to other species.
Cats have been around for hundreds of years and so have birds. Habitat destruction, agricultural use of chemicals, collisions with radio towers, communication towers and even tall buildings in major cities, along with deforestation and climate change have all had a major impact on the state of decline of the bird population.

All these stories of ‘cats killing birds’ is merely nothing more than that, a story. Instead of recognizing the real causes and issues, the facts are ignored and the cats are merely used as scapegoats.

Karen J. McGranahan
Murrells Inlet


Note: The writer is the founder of Bikini Beach Cat Rescue.
Opinions that appear on this page in Letters to the Editor or in columns do not necessarily reflect the opinions of this newspaper.

Leave a Response

Notice about comments:
Gtowntimes.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Gtowntimes.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not gtowntimes.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Post a Comment





Latest Polls

The National Transportation Safety Board is recommending lowering the legal blood alcohol content limit for drivers from .08 percent to .05 percent. They say it will decrease the number of traffic fatalities. Do you agree with this idea?
  • Yes
  • No


Advertisement