For-profit fishing limited on reefs; new law cuts commercial harvest

 

Published on 2/6/2012

The eyewitness account stunned state wildlife officers: a 3-foot-high stack of grouper, piled as far as a football field, on a Georgetown dock. Commercial spear fishing was stripping clean artificial reefs that were meant for recreational fishing, anglers claimed.
Two years later, after The Post and Courier’s 2009 report of the alleged abuses, a federal law has been put on the books to restrict to tight recreational bag limits the commercial harvest and possession of sought-after fish on more than 50 artificial reefs offshore.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries Service law was requested to stop “commercial exploitation of our artificial reefs,” said Robert Boyles, deputy director for the Marine Resources Division at S.C. Department of Natural Resources.
One of the anglers who initially complained isn’t satisfied.
“It’s a step in the right direction,” said recreational fisherman and charter boat Capt. Eric Heiden, of Georgetown. But he opposes allowing any commercial harvest on reefs that were created for recreational anglers and paid by their fees. “It’s still fewer fish for recreational fishermen. I don’t feel any recreational reef should be allowed to have fish harvested for sale. Period.”
Enforcement remains a problem. State wildlife officers are the only patrolling presence offshore enforcing fishing laws; the patrols are paid for by federal funds that have been cut back. Dock inspections are hit and miss, both anglers and regulators have said.
“Manpower is always an issue,” said Maj. Chisolm Frampton of DNR law enforcement. But he’s confident that DNR can work with federal agencies for the funds and assistance to get the job done.
The “special management zone” reef law restricts the catch of prized snapper-grouper species and migratory fish, such as wahoo and tuna.
State officials sought the restriction when angling groups protested the reported 2009 harvest of thousands of pounds of grouper by two Florida-based boats. The boats’ owner conceded then that the crews harvested a lot of fish, but said he didn’t think they were taking so many that other anglers were deprived.
Any regulatory fix was ticklish, because the offshore reefs belong to the state but the waters are governed by federal regulation. Recreational divers and anglers are limited to a bag limit that is usually only a few of each species. Commercial divers had no limits except for large federal quotas. When state officials said they wanted to hold everybody to the recreational limits, federal regulators frankly conceded they had never tried anything like that.

By Bo Petersen
bpetersen@postandcourier.com

Leave a Response

Notice about comments:
Gtowntimes.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Gtowntimes.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not gtowntimes.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Post a Comment





Latest Polls

If the Republican Primary were to be held tomorrow, who would you support for Georgetown County Sheriff?
  • Sheriff Lane Cribb
  • Doug Dishong


Advertisement