'Poor leadership' for City alleged at candidate forum
A large crowd attended the City Council candidates’ forum at the Maryville Social Hall on Monday night.

 

Published on 9/29/2009

By Scott Harper

sharper@gtowntimes.com

The city has poor leadership and needs to be more open to the public. Those were among the charges made by candidates for Georgetown mayor and city council at a forum Monday night.

In front of a packed Maryville Social Hall at a forum sponsored by the GOP Patriot's Club, the candidates answered questions about the future of Georgetown and how they plan to make it a better place if they are elected.

The candidates for mayor are Democrat Jack Scoville, Republican Marty Tennant and petition candidates Bob Sizemore and Kizzie Lawson along with write-in candidate Ron Charlton.

Lawson was absent from the forum.

There are three city council seats up for grabs.

Incumbent Democrat Brendon Barber and Democrat newcomers Jeanette Ard and Dedric Bonds will face Republicans Paige Sawyer, an incumbent, and newcomers Bruce Yablin and Jim Moody.

"We have poor leadership in the city. We do a terrible job with PR for those who live here and for those wanting to come," Ard said. "There is a lack of common sense when decisions are made and that costs lots and lots of money."

She said just because things such as vehicles are budgeted does not mean they must be purchased.

Yablin said one way the city has shown lack of leadership is by not having sidewalks on a lot of roads where children are walking.

"I believe they are waiting until someone gets hit by a car before they do something about it," he said.

Bonds said when he travels he sees places that are growing.

"Georgetown in languishing. We need an environment in City Hall" that makes business owners want to locate here, Bonds said.

Scoville, elected to city council in 2005, said the "lack of strong proactive leadership" has hurt business recruitment in the city.

He said recently-hired City Administrator Chris Eldridge is helping to turn things around.

Sawyer said until the population of the city increases to support them, it will be hard to attract new businesses.

"I have presented countless ideas but they have been ignored," he said.

He said the fact the city, unlike the county, has no impact fees should be used as a recruitment point.

"We should use that to entice businesses to come to the city," Sawyer said.

Land purchase

The city's recent $1.07 million purchase of 18 acres of land for a new Maryville fire station provided ammunition for newcomer candidates.

Tennant said he would like to see the vote to approve the purchase reversed.

"It was an unwise expenditure and was done in a rushed manner. They did not even wait for an the environmental assessment to come back before they agreed to buy it," he said.

Sizemore said, if elected, he will work to make sure the city "spends as little as possible to get the best purchases."

Other cost savings

The candidates were also asked by Georgetown Timed Executive Editor Bob Piazza, the moderator, about ways they would help the city be more efficient.

Scoville said the city could eliminate five meter reading positions if the meters were upgraded.

Tennant -- who said he would forgo his first year's salary if elected -- suggested the city look at possibly combining some city and county departments, such as Planning and Zoning, that are duplicated.

Charlton echoed that idea.

"Marty took my thunder about working with the county," Charlton said, adding he would also like to see GPS systems on city vehicles to cut down on gas consumption.

Barber agreed that the use of cars needs to be studied to see if savings can be found but he also brought up the idea of a four-day workweek.

Ard said she would look at each department to see where savings can be found. She said by implementing more technology, fewer hires would need to be made.

"We can save by cutting out duplications of effort," she said.

Miscellaneous

•  Some candidates said they want to see the city televise meetings on cable TV but Yablin said the city is wasting a resource it already has. He said the city-owned radio station (105.7 FM) should be used to broadcast meetings.

• Moody said the city needs to create an "emergency evacuation route" so that traffic can get around when one of the main highways, such as Highway 17, are closed due to flooding. He said the drainage system needs to be completed to help with that problem.

• Sawyer drew one of the few laughs of the night when he talked about trying to make sure city workers are earning their pay. He said there are some workers who give 100-percent.

"They give 12-percent on Monday, 15-percent on Tuesday," he said as the audience chuckled.

He also said he has tried to implement a one-day-per-month furlough which would save the city $260,000.

• The forum was mainly cordial but there was a little tension between Tennant and Scoville.

Scoville, who said there is more to being mayor than being a good speech maker or a technician, added he is "the most capable person" to run the city.

Tennant responded by saying "if Jack was the type of person he describes himself to be, we wouldn't be where we are now."

Right. That proves facts speak for themselves.

Posted by on 10/1/2009


Kinda proves my point of not being a 100 percent party follower, now doesn't it. And there is a renewal process going on today. http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/10/liveblogging-senate-judiciary-patriot-act-mark

Posted by Jamie Sanderson on 10/1/2009


What has the Patriot Act got to do with anything? Your statement is nothing more than some wacko talking point from moveon.org. Here's the vote for the 2001 and it's 2006 renewal: These were 98 U.S. senators for voted in favor of the US Patriot Act of 2001 (Senator Landrieu (D-LA) did not vote) Senator Russ Feingold of Wisconsin was the only senator who voted against the Patriot Act on October 24, of 2001. There were 89 U.S. senators who voted in favor of the March 2, 2006 Renewal of the Patriot Act. Get your facts straight!

Posted by Diss Custed on 10/1/2009


Lee, thanks for the civility in the response. I can relate to you about things being rushed, as was the Patriot Act and all its receding of civil liberties. However, from what I have seen the deal looks kosher to me. As far as being a party loyalist, I am loyal to our principles, and as you'll see in my recent postings, I have no problem calling out blue dogs who throw us under the bus. Thanks for commenting.

Posted by Jamie Sanderson on 9/30/2009


Jamie--I have never said a new fire station was not needed in M'ville. I personally believe the area is in dire need. I just think when a purchase that large is made without proper public input and following some sense of protocol that we, the people, are the ones who suffer in the long run. Jack's letter shed some light on this; however, has a feasibility study been done? How will the building be retrofitted to serve these needs and at what cost? Will all the good ides get implemented? WHY WAS THIS RUSHED? I can see from your writings and your blog Jamie that you are a party loyalist. I have lost my loyalty to the democrats thanks mostly to Reid and Pelosi and can no longer support just any candidate because they are on my side of the fence. We have gone from being we the people and a government of the people for the people and by the people to "sit back you idiot we know what is best and will tell you so". Many Georgetonians and Amercians have begun to feel this way and much of the anger out there is justified.

Posted by Lee Padgett on 9/30/2009


Maybe Scoville's letter will help as well, Lee. http://www.gtowntimes.com/story/Letters--September-30--2009_-Fire-station--Sanderson

Posted by Jamie Sanderson on 9/30/2009


It is not a debacle, Lee. It is something well needed on this side of the bridge, where I live. Where many people live. And remember, we wouldn't such a big outlet if it wasn't for wishful thinking that provided for houseless developments. So, I say kudos for the city council members who actually care enough to think of all its city residents.

Posted by Jamie Sanderson on 9/30/2009


There are two candidates, one for mayor and one for council,that voted for the Eagle Electric debacle. We, the concerned citizens of Georgetown, who do not agree with this purchase and the way it was handled need to demand an explanation from these two. They need to come out publicly and justify their vote and explain why it was cloaked in secrecy or be voted away. So I urge every voter out there who is tired of the this city acting like it has unlimited funds and no accountability to constituents to carefully think before choosing your mayoral and council candidates.

Posted by Lee Padgett on 9/30/2009


Leave a Response

Notice about comments:
Gtowntimes.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Gtowntimes.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not gtowntimes.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Post a Comment





Latest Polls

What do you think should happen to the annual Harborwalk Festival?
  • It should remain at the end of June on Front Street
  • It should be moved to a different month but remain on Front Street
  • It should be moved to a different month and move to East Bay Park
  • It should be canceled


Advertisement