Fines for the pruning or removal of trees in Georgetown County could be increasing, and the list of protected trees could be getting longer.
The Georgetown County Planning Commission held a workshop Thursday and discussed the amount of fines for violating the county's current tree protection ordinance.
Fines now include any amount up to $500.
The proposed tree protection ordinance adds more trees to the protected list, and puts the fines for each violation at an amount of $500 each.
"Previously, 10 trees [damaged] at one time was considered one violation,'' said County Planning Director Boyd Johnson.
The county is seeking to change the tree protection ordinance since there has already been some destruction of trees along the water ways of the Waccamaw Neck.
Besides changing the fine for violating the tree ordinance, Commissioners also debated whether to have longleaf pines protected throughout Georgetown County.
The proposed wording in the new regulations says the longleaf pine would only be protected on the Waccamaw Neck.
Sierra Club Spokesman Robert Schumaker said during Thursday's workshop that the longleaf pines should be protected, since they are home to the endangered red cockaded woodpecker.
Commissioner Jeff Kinard asked why the ordinance would not protect longleaf pines in other parts of Georgetown County.
"If it's a good policy, then why is it limited to the Waccamaw Neck?'' Kinard asked.
"I'm concerned there will be conflict with people on the Western end of the county,'' Johnson said.
According to the longleaf pine Web site, the tree used to cover 30 to 60 million acres of the southeastern United States Coastal Plain.
The trees became overharvested in the past 200 years. Longleaf pines, which grow in the southeast, take at least 20 to 30 years to mature.
The proposed regulations say longleaf pines located on commercially zoned land or multi-family lots within an area bounded by the Waccamaw River and the Atlantic Ocean should be protected - but doesn't extend the protection beyond the Waccamaw Neck.
Commissioners agreed they should take the change to County Council with the Waccamaw Neck protection included, but not try to pass the regulation countywide. Extending the protection for longleaf pines, countywide, would probably be too much of a change at one time, commissioners said.
Landmark trees
The possible new regulations also spells out what is considered a landmark tree, and says those trees can't be cut or removed unless the tree is diseased or causing damage to a structure's foundation.
"Damage to a driveway or patio is not considered sufficient cause for tree removal,'' the ordinance says.
A county permit would be required for most limb and root pruning, except for trees being pruned on single-family lots.
Tree topping wouldn't be allowed, according to the ordinance.
Legacy trees, which includes trees that are planted to honor a person, organization or event, couldn't be removed without the county's permission.
The new ordinance would also ask that developers not remove trees in order to comply with stormwater regulations.
"Developers shall design stormwater infrastructures so as to reduce the number of significant or landmark trees removed.
"Tree density and function are complementary issues to good stormwater retention and system design.''
|
How many more "laws" need to be passed before we stand up as Americans and say "ENOUGH"? Posted by on 11/10/2009 |
|
They are just trying to destroy my family it seems. If the protect the long leaf pine I won't be able to remove the three that threaten my house if there is a storm and the extra money we depend on by thinning and harvesting our land will no longer be there for us.Another source of income lost...this time due to a bird...If I can't cut my trees then I want in writing that the county will repair any damage the trees do to my house and a yearly income to replace what I will lose not being able to harvest our lumber anymore. Posted by on 11/5/2009 |
|
So much for private property rights. Posted by Patrict Henry on 11/2/2009 |
Leave a Response
Gtowntimes.com is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Gtowntimes.com cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not gtowntimes.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Full terms and conditions can be read here.
Post a Comment
Latest Polls
- Most Viewed
- Most Commented
- 150+ Wedgefield residents want POA leaders recalled
- Local woman killed in one-vehicle accident Sunday identified by coroner
- Walker Inman, multi-millionaire heir of Duke fortune dead at 57
- Scoville: 'We definitely are not becoming a ghost town'
- Georgetown's finance director back at work
- Police blotter: 13-year-old unconscious at drinking party
- City finance director may return to work
- New virus symptoms hit Strand, many are sick
- Higharket Street store owner charged with counterfeiting
- Whale dies on local beach
- 150+ Wedgefield residents want POA leaders recalled (110)
- Scoville: 'We definitely are not becoming a ghost town' (21)
- City finance director may return to work (12)
- State ruling: Georgetown is discharging too much pollution into Sampit River (11)
- Georgetown mayor to guest on National Public Radio show Friday morning (11)
- Georgetown's finance director back at work (10)
- COUNTY JOBLESS RATE UP TO 15.3%; NEAR 1997 RECORD HIGH (8)
- Researcher: Local economy may not recover for years (7)
- Handcuffed man escapes custody; now back in jail (6)
- Local woman killed in one-vehicle accident Sunday identified by coroner (6)

